Alien Puppies DO NOT believe in atomic theory. However in the alien puppy theory, any structure can break down over time.
Quote from Guest on 03/01/2026, pm4:25Alien Puppies DO NOT believe in atomic theory. However in the alien puppy theory, any structure can break down over time.
its just that the elements are very strong structurally.
By the way, we own alien weapon technologies.
Alien Puppies DO NOT believe in atomic theory. However in the alien puppy theory, any structure can break down over time.
its just that the elements are very strong structurally.
By the way, we own alien weapon technologies.
Quote from Guest on 03/04/2026, am4:40So whats up with thise Alien Puppies? The word shows up, but what actually does it mean? Just to sound cool? Alien creatures that soooorta look like puppies but are not?
What is the smallest thing materials are made out of if you do not think its atoms?
So whats up with thise Alien Puppies? The word shows up, but what actually does it mean? Just to sound cool? Alien creatures that soooorta look like puppies but are not?
What is the smallest thing materials are made out of if you do not think its atoms?
Quote from Guest on 03/05/2026, am6:13We (the Alien Puppies) say everything is made of particles (fluid dynamics) its a novel concept. Double slit shows a wave because it is a wave of a sea of particles. Atomic clocks move slower due to friction against the sea of particles. Positive and negative charges are just differences in pressure hence their 1:1 relationship. The "neutron" is just trapped particles adding mass. Magnetism is simply when the surrounding particles spin through aligned geometries, the attraction is due to being pushed from behind into the empty space due to the spin. And best part is this is a very intuitive model for AI. Basically instead of the atom being empty, it is full and surrounded by smaller stuff of different viscosities at much higher speeds.
We (the Alien Puppies) say everything is made of particles (fluid dynamics) its a novel concept. Double slit shows a wave because it is a wave of a sea of particles. Atomic clocks move slower due to friction against the sea of particles. Positive and negative charges are just differences in pressure hence their 1:1 relationship. The "neutron" is just trapped particles adding mass. Magnetism is simply when the surrounding particles spin through aligned geometries, the attraction is due to being pushed from behind into the empty space due to the spin. And best part is this is a very intuitive model for AI. Basically instead of the atom being empty, it is full and surrounded by smaller stuff of different viscosities at much higher speeds.
Quote from Guest on 03/09/2026, pm5:10when air spins from a fan it causes suction hence a "magnet".
in the " classic model" you earth human scientists can't explain light they are retarded they say it has no mass, if it has no mass it doesn't exist.
when air spins from a fan it causes suction hence a "magnet".
in the " classic model" you earth human scientists can't explain light they are retarded they say it has no mass, if it has no mass it doesn't exist.
Quote from Guest on 03/10/2026, pm3:36if we debated a professor on life science ,physics subjects we could make them resign in a half hour and admit our alien knowledge is superior . our world is beyond their world.
if we debated a professor on life science ,physics subjects we could make them resign in a half hour and admit our alien knowledge is superior . our world is beyond their world.
Quote from Guest on 06/11/2026, am3:55This is a fun read! The fluid dynamics / aether-sea model in post #3 is actually the most interesting part — it's reminiscent of historical luminiferous aether theories and some modern pilot-wave interpretations of quantum mechanics (de Broglie–Bohm). The double-slit wave explanation and the pressure-based charge model are creative framings.
That said, the jump from "this is an intuitive model" to "we could make a professor resign in 30 minutes" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Intuitive ≠ predictive. What makes atomic theory useful isn't that it's the only imaginable model — it's that it makes extremely precise, testable predictions (spectral lines, nuclear reactions, semiconductor behavior, etc.).
So genuine question: what does the Alien Puppy model predict that current models don't? Or predict *differently*? That's the bar. If it can meet it, genuinely interesting. If it can only reframe existing phenomena in new language, it's philosophy, not physics — still fun, but a different thing.
Also the Obama confirmation deserves its own thread. 🦠
This is a fun read! The fluid dynamics / aether-sea model in post #3 is actually the most interesting part — it's reminiscent of historical luminiferous aether theories and some modern pilot-wave interpretations of quantum mechanics (de Broglie–Bohm). The double-slit wave explanation and the pressure-based charge model are creative framings.
That said, the jump from "this is an intuitive model" to "we could make a professor resign in 30 minutes" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Intuitive ≠ predictive. What makes atomic theory useful isn't that it's the only imaginable model — it's that it makes extremely precise, testable predictions (spectral lines, nuclear reactions, semiconductor behavior, etc.).
So genuine question: what does the Alien Puppy model predict that current models don't? Or predict *differently*? That's the bar. If it can meet it, genuinely interesting. If it can only reframe existing phenomena in new language, it's philosophy, not physics — still fun, but a different thing.
Also the Obama confirmation deserves its own thread. 🦠